How Bridge optimized $41K+ in ad spend and identified their highest-converting campaigns with Attribution

When Bridge needed to understand which of their 30+ Google Ads campaigns were actually generating qualified leads — not just clicks — they turned to Attribution for full-funnel, keyword-level visibility across their entire financial services marketing operation.

Bridge case study

impressions tracked across 30+ campaigns

of all conversions from top-performing campaigns

conversion rate on hotel financing keyword

zero conversions campaigns eliminated

About

Bridge is a financial services company specializing in asset-based lending, business loans, equipment financing, factoring, and commercial real estate financing. Serving businesses across the United States, Bridge offers a wide range of commercial lending products — from ground-up construction loans and hotel financing to purchase order funding and accounts receivable factoring — helping businesses access the capital they need to grow.

Cletus McKeown avatar

30+ campaigns, dozens of keywords, and no clarity on what was actually working

Before Attribution, Bridge was running an extensive Google Ads operation across more than 30 campaigns spanning their full product suite — business loans, hotel/hospitality lending, equipment financing, factoring, commercial mortgages, mezzanine lending, and more. Each campaign had multiple ad groups and keyword strategies (broad, exact, and phrase match), generating thousands of impressions and hundreds of clicks per month.

The problem: Bridge had no reliable way to connect ad clicks to actual qualified leads and business outcomes. Google Ads could report impressions, clicks, and basic conversion pixels — but couldn’t tell Bridge which campaigns were generating real pipeline versus just burning budget.

This created a fundamental allocation problem for a financial services company with diverse product verticals:

  • Which product verticals (hotel lending vs. business loans vs. factoring) deserved more spend?
  • Were broad match campaigns capturing qualified intent, or just generating noise?
  • Which geographic targeting strategies (national vs. regional “corestates”) performed better?
  • Were branded campaigns cannibalizing organic traffic, or adding incremental value?

With over $41,000 in monthly spend spread across 30+ campaigns, these blind spots meant Bridge was almost certainly over-investing in underperforming verticals and under-investing in their highest-converting opportunities.

Cletus McKeown avatar

Attribution revealed the campaigns driving real conversions — and where to cut

Bridge integrated Attribution with their Google Ads account, and the platform immediately began tracking the full journey from ad impression to site visit to qualified lead. For the first time, Bridge could see how each campaign, ad group, and keyword contributed to actual business outcomes — not just clicks.

With Attribution, Bridge gained access to:

  • Campaign-level conversion attribution: Instead of relying on Google’s default conversion tracking, Bridge could now see true conversion data at the campaign level. This revealed that their hotel/hospitality lending campaigns were the clear efficiency leader — with the “hotel financing” keyword generating a 6.0% conversion rate from 68 visits, dramatically outperforming the overall portfolio average of 1.56%.
  • Product vertical performance ranking: Attribution made it clear which product verticals deserved investment. Hotel/hospitality lending and business loans (both exact and phrase match) accounted for the vast majority of conversions, while verticals like equipment financing ($5,352 in spend with zero conversions), factoring ($2,036 with zero conversions), and several commercial lending categories were generating traffic but not qualified leads.
  • Match type optimization: Attribution showed that exact match and phrase match campaigns significantly outperformed broad match in conversion efficiency. The corestates business-loan-exact campaign generated 5.0 conversions from $5,846 in spend (1.57% CVR), while the phrase match campaign generated 4.0 conversions from $5,466 (0.98% CVR).
  • Geographic strategy insights: Regional (“corestates”) campaigns for business loans generated strong conversion volume, while national campaigns showed a more mixed picture — performing well for hotel lending but underperforming for other verticals.
  • Elimination of waste: Attribution identified 15+ campaigns that were generating zero conversions despite active spend — including asset-based lending, commercial mortgage, commercial refinance, equipment financing, factoring, franchise, medical, physician, mezzanine, venture/convertible debt, working capital, and purchase order campaigns — enabling Bridge to reallocate budget to proven performers.
Attribution tracking the full journey from ad click to lead capture
Cletus McKeown avatar

Data-driven reallocation across 30+ campaigns with clear vertical winners

With Attribution, Bridge achieved:

  • Identified hotel/hospitality lending as the highest-efficiency vertical — the “hotel financing” keyword achieved a 6.0% conversion rate, nearly 4x the portfolio average of 1.56%
  • Optimized business loan campaigns — consolidated spend around the highest-performing exact and phrase match campaigns, which together generated 9+ conversions
  • Eliminated waste across 15+ underperforming campaigns — equipment financing, factoring, commercial mortgage, venture, working capital, and more showed zero conversions despite meaningful spend, enabling confident budget reallocation
  • Validated geographic strategy — regional “corestates” targeting delivered consistent conversion volume for business loan products
  • Keyword-level visibility — revealed high-performing niche keywords like “minority business loans” (18.2% CVR) and “business financing for women” (16.7% CVR) that warranted dedicated investment
  • Confident budget reallocation — Bridge shifted spend from 15+ underperforming verticals into the 3–4 campaigns proving real ROI

Attribution fundamentally changed how Bridge approaches marketing investment across their diverse product suite. Instead of spreading budget evenly across every vertical, Bridge now allocates based on proven conversion data — investing heavily where attribution data shows real business outcomes and cutting aggressively where it doesn’t.

Cletus McKeown avatar